The Front Porch Blog, with Updates from AppalachiaThe Front Porch Blog, with Updates from Appalachia

Farces of Coal -episode #1

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

Proudly Sponsored by Verizon Wireless

WARNING: This video of Ted Nugent may be a little too American for the workplace, and definitely contains too much “freedom” for children. Mr. Nugent has some choice words regarding his machine guns and the President of the United States. Ted Nugent will be the featured emcee of the Verizon SponsoredFriends of America” pro-mountaintop removal protest. Again, view Mr. Nugent at your own risk.


Appalachian Voices on Rachel Maddow

Friday, August 28th, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

Rachel Maddow mentioned our work to expose FACES of Coal earlier tonight [below]. Please also check out DeSmogBlog, Jeff Biggers, and ThinkProgress who are breaking and building upon this story as we speak. Meanwhile, Josh Nelson at enviroknow brings the heat to Bonner and Associates, who are trying to scapegoat a single temp employee for their Congressional forgeries. Looks like they have a lot of explaining to do…

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Apologies for not being able to improve the size of the video with MSNBC embeds. Enjoy, and please email the show to tell them THANK YOU for covering coal industry astroturfing and mountaintop removal coal-mining.


K Street PR Firm “Adfero” Hosting FACES

Thursday, August 27th, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

Feel the grassrootsfulness!

Update: Brad Johnson at ThinkProgress has MUCH more.

Earlier today we reported that Adfero, a DC based PR firm, was hosting FACES’ website. The site which allowed you to see who Adfero is hosting was then blocked throughout the day, but has now returned. Fortunately, our friends at DeSmogBlog were smart enough to grab this screenshot below. As of this second, you can also see for yourself here.

Adfero’s mission, according to its website.

Our mission is to provide the most sophisticated public relations services to advance our clients’ public policy or business agendas.

Doesn’t sound that that grassrootsy to me. Again, props to Jim Hoggan, Kevin Grandia, and DeSmogBlog for bringing this information to light. I’m sure they’ll continue to pull this thread and uncover more information about who is behind this organization.

Additionally, and significantly, FACES may not only lack support outside the stock-photo world, but they may also be in violation of istockphoto’s terms of use.

According to parker parrot at DailyKos:

We all love iStock BUT…there are rules about use. This is prohibited:

Use that depicts personal endorsement by model

See here.

They are operating on a fine line here. I think I’ll let the owners of the images know and they can decide if the images are being used correctly.

Recently, the GLBT organization Good As You caught an opposing organization using images in such a manner. That organization was forced to change the photos on their website. Check out their story.

Also, FACES is on Twitter (@FacesofCoal), and a compilation of all these iStockPhotos is their twitter background image. Just sayin…


FACES of Coal are iStockPhotos?!

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

The Farce Continues

We’ve touched on the fact that the new coal industry front group “FACES” has yet to come forward with a list of their members. Well, thanks to a few new media> gumshoes, including our own Jamie Goodman and our friends at DeSmogBlog, we’ve learned that not only is FACES hosted by a K-Street firm called Adfero, but all of the “FACES” of coal are actually just istockphotos. They couldn’t even get real photos of their supporters.

Exhibit A

Exhibit B

Exhibit C

Hmmm, I think I’ve seen these faces before. (Thanks Jed!)

Update I: Our crack team discovered a few more stockphotos overnight. They are posted below the fold.
Update II: It seems the “Adfero” link which was working last night, has been hidden and made private. Hopefully someone got a screenshot before it was closed.











Tree-sit Halts Blasting at Mountaintop Removal Mining Site

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009 | Posted by Jamie Goodman | No Comments

Two activists from Climate Ground Zero and Mountain Justice engaged in a tree sit have halted blasting for a second day at a Massey Energy mine site in West Virginia. The two sitters established themselves on platforms over 80 feet above the ground near the Edwight mountaintop removal mine above Pettry Bottom, within 300 feet of a planned blasting zone.

Two individuals on the ground were arrested and cited for trespassing, but later released because they are the primary line of communication to the tree sitters, who claim they will not climb down until numerous conditions are met by Massey.

This is the thirteenth non-violent direct action and protest in the Coal River Valley this summer. Others include the June 23 protest at Marsh Fork School where NASA scientist James Hansen and activist/actress Daryl Hannah were arrested, and a June 18 civil disobedience action where four individuals scaled a 150-foot dragline on a Massey Energy mine site and unfurled a banner that said, “Stop Mountaintop Removal Mining.”

Visit Climate Ground Zero for the full story and latest updates.


More than 300 Groups Demand a Stronger Climate Bill from the Senate

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

(via the Center for Biological Diversity and EEN. -jdub)

WASHINGTON- A broad coalition of more than 300 faith, human-rights, social justice, and environmental groups sent a letter to U.S. senators today calling for energy and climate legislation that is much stronger than the Waxman-Markey bill that passed the House of Representatives June 26. That bill contained massive giveaways to polluting special interests and would fail to ensure a rapid transition to clean energy.

The groups plan to hand deliver the letter to senators’ state offices next week as part of a larger, grassroots mobilization demonstrating far-reaching support for bold leadership in the fight to solve the climate crisis.

In the letter, the groups express “profound concern” about the House bill and ask senators to usher in “the transformational change and greenhouse emissions reductions required to avert catastrophic climate impacts.” The letter calls for legislation that:

* Reduces atmospheric CO2 concentrations to a safe level of below 350 parts per million;
* Maintains existing Clean Air Act protections against global warming pollution;
* Minimizes the use of offsets and other loopholes;
* Protects vulnerable populations and communities;
* Promotes abundant clean energy;
* Eliminates polluter giveaways; and
* Adheres to preexisting U.S. commitments to the rest of the world.

Comments from a few groups that signed the letter follow:

“We haven’t yet seen the bold leadership from Congress that’s required to solve the climate crisis,” said Church World Service Director of Education and Advocacy Rajyashri Waghray. “We’re sending this letter to demonstrate broad grassroots support for such leadership.”

“We have to have a stronger climate bill than the watered-down version that passed the House,” said San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society Conservation Chair Drew Feldmann.

“We’re organizing on the ground, in communities around/throughout the country, to mobilize the everyday people who will feel climate impacts, and to defeat the entrenched, polluting special interests in Washington and pass a truly strong bill in the Senate,” said Appalachian Voices Legislative Associate J.W. Randolph.

“The everyday people of America have been left out of the climate debate. We are building a grassroots movement that reflects the diversity of America, to mobilize everyday people who are experiencing the affects of climate change. We aim to defeat entrenched fossil fuel polluting special interests in Washington and pass a truly strong climate bill,” said Tom Goldtooth of the Indigenous Environmental Network.

“There’s an impressive breadth of groups on this letter, and it demonstrates that the status quo isn’t acceptable. Congress must pass a bill that actually gives us a fighting chance of avoiding runaway global warming. There’s no other option,” said Tyson Slocum, who directs Public Citizen’s energy program.

The letter reads as follows…


The Honorable Barbara Boxer
Chairwoman, U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Hart Building 112
Washington, D.C. 20510

Cc: Members of the Senate and President Barack Obama

Dear Senator Boxer,

Thank you for your continued leadership on the climate crisis. The environmental, economic, and public health threats of global warming — both in the United States and around the world — require a strong climate bill. We are profoundly concerned that as currently written, H. R. 2454 (the American Clean Energy and Security Act or “ACES”) falls far short. We are writing on behalf of the millions of members our organizations represent to urge you to draft a companion bill that provides the transformational change and greenhouse emissions reductions required to avert catastrophic climate impacts.

The Senate bill must set an economy-wide cap on greenhouse emissions that is consistent with the best available science and that can be ratcheted down as necessary. Findings from the U.S. Global Change Research Center, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and many other institutions and scientists indicate that the atmospheric greenhouse gas stabilization target of 450 parts per million CO2eq is far too high to avoid the risk of catastrophic climate change. Leading scientists currently warn that CO2 must be reduced to no more than 350 parts per million. Yet the cap set by H. R. 2454 is insufficient even to achieve 450 parts per million CO2eq. The Senate bill must contain reduction targets consistent with the best available science, representing the U.S. fair global share of reductions within the world’s remaining carbon budget, and it must include immediate action on short-lived global warming pollutants, including black carbon and methane, to slow warming in the near term.

The Clean Air Act already provides many of the necessary tools to reduce greenhouse pollutants. Therefore, the Clean Air Act rollbacks in H. R. 2454 — which would actually reduce existing pollution control requirements, facilitate the construction of additional coal-fired power plants, and grandfather in unnecessary pollution from existing plants — must be removed. The critical safety net of the Clean Air Act must be retained, not discarded in favor of a new, untested system, placing all of our eggs in one precarious basket. Existing Clean Air Act authority should be strengthened by adding deadlines for the oldest and dirtiest coal-fired power plants to meet pollution reduction requirements or shut down.

The Senate bill should eliminate the many loopholes in H. R. 2454 and ensure the integrity of the pollution-reduction system. A top priority must be to eliminate or greatly limit and restrict offsets, which allow actual pollution from capped sources to increase, creating localized toxic hotspots in people of color and vulnerable communities; delay a shift to low carbon technologies in the United States; and increase the risks in carbon markets. In addition, the House provision prohibiting a full life-cycle analysis of biofuels must be reversed.

The Senate bill should protect low- and middle- income families. Regardless of the chosen mechanism, the setting of carbon prices must be transparent, stable, and predictable, while minimizing the ability of private entities to manipulate the carbon price. We do not believe the market mechanisms contained in the current cap-and-trade proposal achieve this. The Senate bill should ensure there are adequate protections from climate change for low-income families, vulnerable communities domestically and globally, and Native American and indigenous peoples, including protections and dividends for low-income consumers and adequate international
finance for adaptation. The Senate bill should provide for abundant clean energy. The Senate bill should provide mandates and
incentives for abundant clean energy sources such as low-impact solar, wind, and non-dam hydro, which do not add toxic burdens to communities and workers and do not require incineration technologies.

The Senate bill should eliminate polluter giveaways, including massive subsidies to coal and oil. Scarce government funding should not go to dangerous fossil fuel or nuclear industries or allow damaging practices such as mountaintop-removal mining. Instead, public money should go to investments in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and the creation of green jobs.

The Senate bill should live up to the United States’ international obligations. For a fair global deal with meaningful global emissions reductions, the United States must both deeply reduce emissions domestically and provide adequate international climate finance for clean technology, adaptation, and support to stop deforestation. Fulfilling these commitments will be essential to securing an effective international agreement.

We recognize the massive political effort that is necessary to pass climate legislation, but a bill with inadequate targets, loophole-ridden mechanisms, rollbacks of our flagship environmental laws, and inadequate financing to help developing countries address climate change will move us in the wrong direction. We urge you to pass a strong climate bill consistent with the principles outlined above.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

350.org
Acterra
ActionAid USA
Alameda Creek Alliance
Amazon Watch
American Center for Life Cycle Assessment Institute for Environmental Research & Education
Animal Welfare Institute
Animas Valley Institute
Anza Water Conservation Association
Appalachian Voices
Arizona Wilderness Coalition
Atlanta Mentorship Program for Sustainability
Audubon South Carolina
Battle Creek Alliance
Bedford Global Warming Coalition
Berkeley Partners for Parks
BioTour
Blanket the Globe
Borneo Project
California Coastkeeper Alliance
California Interfaith Power and Light
California Native Plant Society
Californians for Western Wilderness
Calumet Project
Canary Coalition
Caney Fork Headwaters Association
Carolina Biodiesel, LLC
Carolinas Clean Air Coalition
Carolinas Clean Air Coalition
Caribbean Conservation Corporation
Cascadia Wildlands
Center for a Sustainable Coast
Center for Biological Diversity
Center for Native Ecosystems
Center of Concern
Center on Race Poverty and the Environment
Central California Environmental Justice Network
Central New Mexico Audubon Society
Chalice Farm and Sustainable Living Center
Champaign County Audubon Society
Chesapeake Climate Action Network
Church World Service
Citizens Against Ruining the Environment
Citizens for Quality Environment
CitizensforSanity.Com, Inc.
Citizens for Sludge-Free Land
Citizens League for Environmental Action Now (CLEAN)
Citizens United for Resources and Environment (CURE)
Clarksville Warioto Chapter of Audubon
Clean Air Watch
Clean Coast
Climate Law & Policy Project
Coastside Habitat Coalition
Coastwalk California
Colorado Grizzly Project
Columban Center for Advocacy and Outreach
Committee for a Better Alpaugh
Communities for a Better Environment
Community Coalition for Environmental Justice of Seattle WA
Community Conservation
Community Environmental Council
Community Water Center
Concerned Arizona Science Educators
Conservation Northwest
CORALations
Corporate Ethics International
CREDO
Cumberland Countians for Peace & Justice
Deer Creek Valley Natural Resources Conservation Association
Delaware Audubon Society
Desert Fishes Council
Dogwood Alliance
Don’t Waste Arizona, Inc.
Earth Day Los Angeles
Earth Island Institute
EARTHWORKS
Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch
Eco-Eating
EcoEquity
Eco-Justice Collaborative
EcoLaw Massachusetts
Education for Global Warming Solutions
Elisha Mitchell Audubon Society
Endangered Habitats League
Endangered Small Animal Conservation Fund
Environmental Alliance of North Florida
Energy Alliance of Puerto Rico
Environmental Defenders of McHenry County
Environmental Defense Center
Environmental Health Group
Environmental Law Society, University of Michigan Law School
Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC)
Environmental Studies Program Prescott College
Fairmont, Minnesota Peace Group
Faiths United for Sustainable Energy (FUSE)
Florida League of Conservation Voters
Floridians Against Incincerators In Disguise
Focus the Nation
ForestEthics
Forests of the World, LLC
Franciscan Sisters of Mary
Fresno Metro Ministry
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Friends of the Earth
Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley
Friends of the Owls
Friends of the River
Friends of the Santa Clara River
Friends of Whithaven Park
Fund for Wild Nature
Gallaudet Swim Club
Gila Conservation Coalition
Gila Regional Information Project
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
Global Community Monitor
Global Exchange
Global Green USA
Global Justice Ecology Project
Global Warming Education Network
Golden Gate Audubon
Grand Canyon Trust
Grand Canyon Wildlands Council
Great Old Broads for Wilderness
Green Delaware
Green Peace Corps
Green Press Initiative
Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice
Greenpeace
Greenwood Earth Alliance
Gulf Restoration Network
Halifax River Audubon
Haverhill Environmental League
Heartwood
Help Our Polluted Environment (HOPE) in Taylor County, FL
High Road for Human Rights
Hilltown Anti-Herbicide Coalition
Honor the Earth
Huachuca Audubon Society
Humboldt Baykeeper
HOPE TO ACTION: Women for a Greener Planet
Independent Environmental Conservation & Activism Network
Indigenous Environmental Network
Interfaith Council for the Protection of Animals and Nature
International Center for Technology Assessment
International Forum on Globalization
International Rivers
nternational Society for the Preservation of the Tropical Rainforest
International Tribal Association
Jewish Vegetarians of North America
KAHEA: The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance
Kalmiopsis Audubon Society
Kentucky Heartwood
Kentucky Mountain Justice
Kickapoo Peace Circle
Kids vs. Global Warming
Klamath Forest Alliance
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Klickitat Valley Cyclists
Kodiak Audubon
KyotoUSA
Lake Merritt Institute
Leadership Team of the Sisters of the Most Precious Blood of O’Fallon, MO
Lexington Global Warming Action Coalition
Life of the Land (Hawai`i)
Local Clean Energy Alliance
Lutheran Peace Group – Jemez Springs, NM
Martha’s Vineyard Peace Council
Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Massachusetts Coalition for Healthy Communities
Massachusetts Power Shift
Medical Mission Sisters, Alliance for Justice
Mennonite Central Committee Washington Office
Mercury Free Wisconsin
Michigan Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Network
Minnesota Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Alliance
Montana Rivers
Monteverde Conservation League US
Morning Sun Foundation
Mountain Meadows Conservancy
Musicians United to Sustain the Environment
National Catholic Rural Life Conference
National Center for Conservation Science and Policy
National Gray Panthers
Native Alerts
Native American Women’s Health Education Resource Center
Nature in the City
NC WARN: North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network
Near West Citizens for Peace and Justice
Nebraska Wildlife Rehab, Inc.
Network Alliance of Congregations Caring for Earth (NACCE)
Network for Environmental & Economic Responsibility United Church of Christ
Nevada Nuclear Waste Task Force
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance
No Impact Project
No New Nukes
North Suburban Peace Initiative (NSPI)
Northcoast Environmental Center (NEC)
Northern Climate Change Network
Northwest Coalition for Responsible Investment
Northwest Ecological Research Institute
Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, NY
Nuclear Energy Information Service
Nuclear Information and Resource Service
Nuclear Watch South
Occidental Arts and Ecology Center
Office of Justice, Peace, & Integrity of Creation for the School Sisters of Notre Dame, St. Louis Province
Oil Change International
Oil Independent Berkeley
Olympia Climate Action
Orangetown Environmental Committee
Oregon Environmental Council
Oregon Natural Desert Association
Oregon Wild
Owe Aku (Bring Back the Way)
Pacific Environment
Pacifica Climate Committee
Peaceful Uprising
Portland Audubon
Post Carbon Institute
PREACT McLeod
Project Coyote
Public Citizen
Puerto Rico Ornithological Society
Rainforest Action Network
Redwood Alliance Climate Action Project
Renewable Energy Office for Cornwall
Residents for a Livable Moreno Valley
Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands (REDOIL)
Resource Renewal Institute
Restore Sharp Park
Rising Tide North America
Rivers Unlimited
Romm ‘n’ Legions
Rural Coalition
Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN)
San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society
San Francisco Baykeeper
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace
Santa Fe Forest Watch
Save Union County
SaveNature.Org
Sciencecorps
Sea Turtle Restoration Project
Sequoia Audubon Society
Shalom Center
Sirius Ecovillage Community and Sustainable Living Education Center
Sisters of Charity of Nazareth Central Leadership
Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia
Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet and Associates
Siskiyou Project
Sky Island Alliance
Slow Food USA
Society of Ethical and Religious Vegetarians
Sojourners
Solar Cookers International
Soroptimist International of Goldendale
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Southern Energy Network
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Stand Up/Save Lives Campaign
Stewards of the Earth
Sustainable Arizona
Sustainable Energy & Economy Network
Sustainable Futures Society
Sustainable Sanctuary Coalition of Greater Kansas City
Tennessee Interfaith Power & Light
Texas Climate Emergency Campaign
The Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility
The Association of Irritated Residents (AIR)
The Coral Reef Alliance (CORAL)
The Enviro Show, WXOJ
The Forest Foundation, Inc
The Sunshine Environment Link
The TriCounty Watchdogs
Tikkun-Network of Spiritual Progressives
Tortoise Reserve
Tri-Valley CAREs
Tucson Audubon
Tuolumne River Trust
Turtle Island Restoration Network
Union County Peace Council
Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of California
Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of Florida
Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of Maryland
Unitarian Universalist Ministry for Earth
Unitarian Universalist Massachusetts Action Network
Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
Unitarian Universalists of Goldendale
Unitarian Universalists United Nations Office
United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries
University of Denver Environmental Law Clinic
Ursuline Sisters of the Roman Union, Central Province
Ursulines of Tildonk for Justice and Peace
Valley Watch
Vast Horizons
Veg Climate Alliance
Via Media USA, an Episcopal Church organization
Waterkeeper Alliance
Watershed Management Group
Washington State Unitarian Universalist Voices for Justice
WCL Program on International and Comparative Environmental Law
West Coast Climate Equity
Western Nebraska Resources Council
Western North Carolina Physicians for Social Responsibility
Western Wildlife Conservancy
Wild Equity Institute
WildEarth Guardians
Wildlife Center of Virginia
Williamsburg Climate Action Network
Winnemem Wintu Tribe
Women, Food and Agriculture Network
Women’s Voices for the Earth
www.SafeEnergyAnalyst.org
Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation


Another Coal Plant Goes Down

Monday, August 24th, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

This Time in South Carolina

Today rate-payers and oxygen users can breathe a little easier, as the Santee Cooper company nixed its plans to build another coal plant in the state.

A committee of the state-owned utility voted this morning to suspend an effort to secure permits for the $2.2 billion plant in Florence County along the Great Pee Dee River. The full Santee Cooper board is expected to ratify the vote at noon today.

The agency’s action makes it unlikely the plant will ever be built, said Santee Cooper board Chairman O.L. Thompson.

South Carolina is one of the top 10 users of mountaintop removal coal. Its also pays the second highest price for coal in the US, behind New Jersey.
There are currently 12 coal-fired power plants in the state. The website SCsaysNO.com has more info on the impacts that this plant would have had on the health, economy, and environment.


Farces of Coal

Friday, August 21st, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

Another shiny coal industry front group. How authentic.

The coal industry PR generators must be running low on fuel, because they have been misfiring repeatedly over the course of the Summer, and it looks like they may have another false start with “FACES” (Federation for American Coal, Energy, and Security).

Who are they? Well nobody knows. Kate Sheppard at Grist asks, “who are the faces behind FACES of coal?”

Grist tried to find out more about FACES, as the website does not list members or funders. The only contact information listed is an email address, and our email inquiry bounced back.

Are there any actual faces behind FACES?

What are they saying? Definitely nothing new. Do their claims actually hold water? A quick look through their website basically shows a bunch of direct links to and quotes from the National Mining Association, so I decided to look at some of FACES’ “facts” to see if they stand up. The coal industry has paid Tennessee a lot of attention by publicly avoiding the state, and its my home state. So lets look at the “Faces of Coal” “US Coal and Tennessee” fact sheet.

Coal supplies half the electricity consumed by Americans.

False. Coal used to supply half the electricity consumed by Americans. Electric generation from coal is down to 42.6% in May of this year. That is a significant amount of energy, but its by no statistical stretch of the imagination “half.” The more inclusive “year-to-date” number for Jan-May 2009 puts coal down at about 45.4% of our electricity production and dropping.

Tennessee produced 2.3 million tons of coal in 2008.

True. However, this amounts to a 12% drop from the previous year, and totals just 0.19% of US coal production in 2008.

Tennessee powers Tennessee – Sixty-four percent of Tennessee’s electricity is generated from coal.

False and probably no longer true. As of 2007, zero percent of Tennessee’s electricity generation is generated from Tennessee coal. Coal consumption in Tennessee for 2009 is down 20% compared to the same time period in 2008, so I can’t imagine they could prove that 64% of TN electricity still comes from coal.
.

In 2007, coal mining in Tennessee generated about $2.9 billion in output.

This is a “National Mining Association” number. The most recent study (Hendryx, WVU) shows that coal contributes to about $8 billion in benefits to the Appalachian region. But it also notes that the costs to the region because of coal mining are around $50 billion, for a net loss of about $42 billion dollars annually. A study by MACED looked at inputs and outputs to the Kentucky state budget from coal mining. The study concludes that it actually costs the state a net loss of -$115 million dollars every year to keep mining coal.

Any more?

Tennessee families depend on coal mining for good jobs. – Coal mining provides jobs for the long-term.

Coal provides a few jobs in Tennessee, but they are definitely not long term. Again, the real picture is much more complicated than that. In reality, Tennessee has lost 75% of the mining jobs it had just 25 years ago.

Mining in Tennessee supports over 21,000 jobs, paying hundreds of millions of dollars in annual wages. – In Eastern Tennessee alone, coal mining employs more than 1,000 people.

If by “eastern Tennessee”, they mean “central” Tennessee (there’s no coal in the Smokies), then they are talking about ALL the coal mining jobs in Tennessee. Thats like saying that “there are hundreds of miles of ocean-front property in eastern North Carolina alone, and thats just at the beach!”

Coal mining jobs are well paid. The average wage for a coal worker in Tennessee is about $61,000, more than 10 percent higher than the average wage for jobs in other industries in the state.

Coal mining jobs may be well paid, but that’s not really the point. Brittany Spears is well paid, but that doesn’t mean I think what she is doing is beneficial to my community. As pointed by MACED for Kentucky, the results of coal-mining operations on the state budget of Tennessee are minimal at best and potentially negative. Coal mining is a relatively small industry in Tennessee, generating $67 million compared with tourism’s $14.2 billion. And the counties that have higher instances of mining have lower socioeconomic status, higher unemployment, and higher mortality than surrounding counties in Appalachia, as pointed out by Hendryx.

Tennessee invests in protecting the environment. Tennessee coal invests millions of dollars in coal mine land restoration, or reclamation, projects.

Reclamation is a critical part of the mining process. Commercial development, economic development, or even reforestation is better than just blasting apart a mountain, declaring bankruptcy, and bolting. The fact that Tennessee coal invests millions to reclaim the land they’ve destroyed is a good thing, but it definitely isn’t sufficient, and it definitely isn’t an improvement over what was there before. There is an abundance of “flat land” already available. In fact, around 1 million undeveloped acres of it which has been wrought by MTR. So, please feel free to build yourself a golf course on a mountain that is already destroyed and stop blowing up new mountains.

But I don’t think we should expect that much. According to the 2003 DEIS, less than 2-3% of land that is mountaintop removal mined is recovered in some kind of economic or commercial development

2003 EPA EIS, Appendix G, Land Use Assesment, page 43:

Given current and foreseeable future land use demands, it is unlikely that any more than 2 to 3% of the future post-mining land uses will be developed land uses such as housing, commercial, industrial, or public facility development.

Potential permanent impacts will likely include some resident population relocation due to close proximities of people and potential future mining.

So is reclamation important? Absolutely. But is the coal industry doing enough of it? Well…I’d say 97% no.

Mountaintop mining is a sophisticated mining technique that is the safest way…

Baloney. Coal mining is a dangerous job, and mountaintop removal mining transfers the dangers inherent in mining coal from the professional miner onto the surrounding communities. Secondly, there is not a lot of proof that surface mining is that much safer to the workers than underground mining. In 2008, according to MSHA, coal’s “non-fatal days lost” because of injury are almost even between surface and underground mining. 218 of 394, or 55% are from underground mining. 176 of 394, or 45%, are from surface mining. As the overburden ratio increases, and Btu decreases, surface miners are having to move larger amounts of earth to provide us the same amount of energy, increasing the dangers inherent in the operation. I the last few years, according to MSHA, surface mining fatalities have been increasing as a percentage vs underground mining and on-site fatalities.

But this is my favorite from “FACES”:

… and at times the only way – to mine coal near the surface in rugged terrain. It improves productivity and protects the environment.

Top officials at Patriot Coal are saying that “we can mine it underground.”

According to the Energy Information Administration, the estimated recoverable reserves in Appalachia are mostly classified as “underground” rather than “surface” mineable coal. Although in reality these are not mutually exclusive classifications, its still important to show that we can get at most of the coal by other ways than blowing the tops off of the mountains.

West Virginia: 87% underground, 13% surface.
Kentucky: 49% underground, 51% surface
Tennessee: 61% underground, 39% surface
Virginia: 78% underground, 22% underground

Yeah, FACES comes from a world where blowing up mountains and dumping the waste into streams (which even officials in the WVDEP are now saying harms water quality) is environmental “protection.” Sigh…

How I long to have their powers of denial (and their industrial allies’ money!)


Coal Industry to hold “Friends of America” Rally

Friday, August 21st, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

And you’re probably not invited.

On September 7th, a bunch of celebrities are throwing a party with Massey Energy to wrap themselves in the flag and put on a big event called the “Friends of America Rally.” The featured guests are Ted Nugent from Detroit, Sean Hannity from New York City, Hank Williams Jr. from Shreveport, LA, and a country singer named John Rich from west Texas, and they are coming to West Virginia to talk about how great and patriotic coal is (and I guess that means mountaintop removal to.)

I wanted to write a post about how ridiculous they all are and the ridiculous things they have all done and said. But, the truth is that all their quotes and actions are very well-documented. After reading more about these individuals and what they’ve accomplished, what they’ve been through, and what they’ve attempted to contribute to society in their own ways (and let me just say that Sean Hannity is on very thin ice here), I am fine to say that we just aren’t going to agree on most things. People can disagree without being disagreeable. We aren’t going to see eye to eye on most things that have to do with coal, energy, economic development, or the way that the government interacts with ecosystems and communities. And thats cool. We can disagree. This is America.

And thats the point.

Has the political conversation weakened so much in this country that those of us working tirelessly to raise our families and protect our homes are somehow not “Friends of America” because we believe in protecting our drinking water from coal waste? Are we not American because we believe that science shows us we have to take action on climate change? Do we sympathize with terrorists if we don’t support one candidate or the other? Mountaintop removal is SUPER AMERICAN and Lamar Alexander is not? C’mon, stop living in a cartoon!

America is much more than just the way we choose to grow our economy or the way we choose to treat coal waste. Whatever Ted Nugent has to say on the 7th, let him say it. Our forefathers created a place where free speech is allowed. However, criticisms of Ted Nugent aside, can’t he please stop acting like anybody who disagrees with him is somehow less than a “Friend of America”? If we’re not a “Friend of America” what are we? Just an acquaintance? Are we an enemy? No, we just have different beliefs. Last time I checked, thats still allowed.

The fact that coal-mining benefits a few people is absolutely, undeniably true. I’m with Jeff Goodell in that there should be a giant monument to coal in every city square in America so that people recognize the importance coal has played in powering American military and industry for the last 100 years. But coal is undeniably hurting people to. Coal-mining (especially mountaintop removal) is hurting our economy, our mountains our communities, and public health. The use of coal and other fossil fuels is leading to catastrophic climate change. For the coal industry and their allies to simply deny reality and to paint anyone who would like to see incremental alterations of the coal industry “anti-American” is just pathetic. Tactics like this won’t work, and its why the fossil fuel industries are having to forge their own support. Sean Hannity, look at the obvious issues that come with coal-mining and help be a part of the solution. The denial, the condescension, and the overheated rhetoric don’t give me much hope that thats going to happen soon. Fortunately, we live in a country that accepts and welcomes most of us. So I’m going to have to continue flying my flag, loving my country, and doing my best to make it a better place in my own way.

And if I wanted to live in a cartoon, I would say Ted Nugent has a tiny flag, and mine hangs out with a Saturn Rocket.


Public Denied Entry into Polluters’ Ultimate Grassrootsfulness Fest

Thursday, August 20th, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

Polluting Industries Forging Support Suprise!, Still?, Again!?!. Wow.

And its not just us craaaaaaaazy environmentalists:

Thanks to our friends at Public Citizen!


No families allowed in “families for coal” group. Say again?

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009 | Posted by Jamie Goodman | No Comments

According to a Grist blog posted today titled “A Farce to be Reckoned With,” a Pennsylvania coal-industry group calling itself Families Organized to Represent the Coal Economy (FORCE) isn’t actually comprised of families after all. Instead, membership criteria is limited to “any Pennsylvania company doing business with the coal industry” and “coal and coal company-related sponsorship.”

The group is responsible for billboards along Penn state highways promoting “clean coal,” which you think would lead the public to believe this group has a lot of “families” supporting “clean coal.”

Read Jonathan Hiskes’ punchy account of his attempts to gather more information from the group.

And be sure to check out his other blog post on the Families Organized to Represent Coal coloring book for kids, appropriately titled “Eyes for Frosty.” As Hiskes says, “At least it picks a relevant topic in snowmen—they won’t be around for long if the coal industry succeeds in stomping all over climate change legislation.”


WV Town to Get Clean Water by “spring”

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009 | Posted by JW Randolph | No Comments

No, not that kind of spring.

I got so excited to see this headline “WV Town to Get Clean Water by spring.” See, I thought to myself, there still are still amazing clean spring-water sources left in some parts of Appalachia. But it turns out that they’re aren’t talking about a “spring” of flowing water, but instead the installation of Prenter’s new water system…in March of 2010.

Don’t you think a more appropriate headline would have been “WV Town to go 8 More Months without Clean Drinking Water“:

Gov. Joe Manchin will be on hand Tuesday as West Virginia American Water breaks ground for a new line that is expected to supply 155 households by March.

Residents of Prenter and Seth are suing eight coal companies they believe poisoned their wells by pumping coal slurry into old underground mines. They claim cracks in the earth allowed the slurry to migrate and pollute the aquifer.

For months, many residents have been hauling clean water home from a pay station at a church. Others rely on free fill-ups of the 50-gallon barrels at their homes.

Update: For more info on Prenter, see Sludge Safety Project, or Ken Ward’s Coal Tattoo blog, which have covered the issue for a long time.

Water filter in Prenter:

Or this penny which has been exposed to the water:



 

 


Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube